Women with heavy, irregular bleeding were ineligible unless the total results of endometrial biopsy were reported to be regular; no further investigations were mandated by the process. All individuals provided written educated consent. Randomization Patients were assigned to a study group by telephone or a Web-based central randomization assistance in the University of Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit. Study Compliance and Interventions Eligible women who provided written educated consent were assigned to either the levonorgestrel-IUS or usual treatment randomly.10,16 This medical treatment to be used was specified before randomization.Sometimes that is even done robotically, with the surgeon remote managing the laparoscope and medical instruments. The useful upshot of this kind of prostate cancers treatment is usually that recovery time is shorter, and hospital stays are greatly diminished, from an average of 4 days down to 1 day. Not bad. There are a few problems with it, however. Some doctors are worried about the direct-to-consumer marketing companies have already been doing to market minimally invasive surgery, leading to extremely fast growth in the usage of the procedure before larger and even more comprehensive studies have been performed. Though it is approved for use Also, the appeal of the surgery for individuals far outweighs evidence that backs up that charm. For example, most prostate cancer individuals are attracted to this treatment based on perceived ease of recovery and shorter hospital stays, which is certainly true, however, many evidence points to a higher risk of urinary incontinence after the surgery, up to 3 x much more likely than with regular radical prostatectomy.